Divided Nations :: essays papers

Isolated Nations Presentation In this exposition, I will talk about both the social factors in isolated countries experienced in the book â€Å"The Violence Within: Cultural and Political Opposition in Divided Nations†, altered by Kay B. Warren, and the techniques by which the supporters of this volume have gathered their information. The wide exhibit of contention and restriction experienced in the book are comprehensive to nations, for example, Northern Ireland, Israel, Egypt, Iran, South Africa, The Philippines, Guatemala, and Brazil. An assortment of creators have loaned their translations and encounters in and of these societies. The techniques for information assortment are wide going, including member perception, delegate, and the records of experts in the equivalent or comparative fields. To begin with, I will depict the social elements adding to distress in every one of these countries, and afterward the strategies by which the creators have gathered their examination material. Social Factors in Northern Ireland There is a long history of restriction to British imperialism in Northern Ireland and truly, expansionism makes a unique case which conveys trademark social impacts in the resistance. Expansionism, as Begona Aretxaga (223) calls attention to, â€Å"not just endeavors and plunders, it likewise makes implications and shapes feelings.†. He further proposes that it is this formation of implications and molding of feeling that separates expansionism from different types of political resistance. It is this impact which has laid the social structure for the political insubordinations of the Irish. The major social vessel used to communicate disagree has generally been found as appetite strikes by political detainees. This training has a broad social premise which can be found in Gaelic convention. The craving strike has likewise increased critical importance from the Catholic religion, drawing from the imagery in that. Though this sort of peaceful dissent has frequently been related with the point of reference set by Ghandi, here it has a rich authentic foundation and was utilized to revitalize and bind together the Irish individuals. From the British point of view, what made expansionism satisfactory to the majority was a social mixture, illustrating the Irish as savages. Their religion was considered agnostic. This strict disparity has penetrated as the years progressed, and been the primary wellspring of contrast as observed between these two elements. Next, I will report the social segments adding to the contention in Israel. Social Factors in Israel The fairly noteworthy social

A child Called It by Dave Pelzer Essay -- essays research papers

One Child’s Courage to Survive: â€Å" A Child Called It † Theoretical This is truly outstanding, yet saddest books that I have ever perused. There are such a significant number of awful things out there that are going on to great individuals. We simply have no clue. No one can really tell what is happening in secret. I am so fortunate not to have encountered anything like this growing up. There is such a great amount of reality in this book, however I never realized that the truth was ever this terrible. It carried me to an acknowledgment that I have never known. It is very dismal that something like this truly happened to such a sweet young man. Rundown      A Child Called â€Å"It† is a story dependent on a genuine little boy’s tribulations with his moms stunning maltreatment. The initial segment of Dave's life was unspoiled in his memory- - he says his family was "the Brady Bunch"- - a caring mother and father with whom he delighted in awesome occasions and an upbeat outing to the Russian River. Everybody outwardly imagined that David’s family was great. Nobody in their neighborhood would have suspected anything wasn't right. All that changed when Dave was in first grade. For no known explanation, his mom singled him out from his kin and started mishandling him. The maltreatment started moderately gently. At the point when he and his siblings accomplished something incorrectly, Dave was the one to get discipline - from the start essentially expulsion to the edge of a room. At that point, his mom started going through her days sitting in front of th e TV and drinking brew. Effortlessly bothered, she hollered at Dave for the smallest explanation, or some of the time for reasons unknown by any means. Before long, rather than causing him to go down to the storm cellar, Mrs. Pelzer crushed Dave's face against the mirror, at that point made him rehash, again and again, "I'm an awful kid! I'm a terrible boy!" He had to represent hours gazing into that reflect. Dave's dad before long joined The Mother, as David called her, in her drinking. He, as well, realized David was a "good boy." He didn't participate in the maltreatment, however he didn't to stop it, either. David was dealt with like a slave in his own home. His mom regarded him as though he wasn’t even an individual from the family like no one worth mentioning or a â€Å"It†. She previously alluded to him as, â€Å"The Boy, at that point it immediately changed to It†. No one at his school preferred him, they called him &a mp;quot;Pelzer Smelzer" in light of the fact that his mother never washed his garments and made him wear something very similar consistently. After school, o... ...er of the Year. In 1993 Dave was respected as one of the Ten Outstanding Young Americans (TOYA), joining a recognized gathering of graduated class that incorporates Chuck Yeager, Christopher Reeve, Anne Bancroft, John F. Kennedy, Orson Wells and Walt Disney. (Dave Pelzer Biography 2002, Para. 2) In 1994 Dave was the main American to be chosen as one of The Outstanding Young Persons of the World (TOYP), for his endeavors including kid misuse mindfulness and avoidance, just as for imparting strength in others. During the Centennial Olympic games, Dave was a torchbearer, conveying the desired fire (Dave Pelzer Biography 2002, Para. 2) References American Psychological Association. (2001) Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (fifth ed). Washington, DC: McLaughlin & Reinking A Child Called It. (1995). Wellbeing Communications, INC. Deerfield Beach, FL: Dave Pelzer The World of Psychology. (2002). A Pearson Education Company. Boston, MA: Samuel Wood & Ellen Green Wood p. 593 Dave Pelzer Biography. (1997-2002) Book Browse LLC, Davina Morgan-Witts, CEO. San Jose, CA. (para.2). Recovered 04/29/02 from http://www.bookbrowse.com/index.cfm/writer/authorID/145.htm

Service Corporation International

History, Development and Growth of the organization Service Corporation International started its tasks in 1962. Robert L. Waltrip shaped the organization. From the start, it started its activity in Houston (USA). It was set up to offer memorial service administrations, crematoria and graveyard offices. Administration Corporation International has extended from Houston to North America. It offers burial service administrations and graveyard offices chiefly in United States and Canada.Advertising We will compose a custom contextual investigation test on Service Corporation International explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More The Company has set up more than 3,000 memorial service areas, more than 500 graveyards and around 200 crematoria. What's more, it started to offer protection benefits in five mainlands (SCI, 2011). To improve its tasks, the organization directs numerous business exercises. These exercises incorporate marking of administrations and securing of othe r comparative organizations to increase upper hand. For example, Service Corporation International has united every one of its items under one brand name ‘Dignity Memorial’. This was intended to build administration conveyance to clients just as lift its acknowledgment. Administration International Corporation has figured out how to extend consistently because of obtaining of extra memorial service homes. The first names of the obtained firms just as the current administration are held after the procurement. The organization just guarantees that their logo is utilized to distinguish all the property it possesses. This has empowered it to extend subtly without the notification of its rivals. It has accomplished notoriety in the market since it is one of the best associations. In such manner, it is evaluated to be one of the exceptionally prepared suppliers of burial service and graveyard administrations. Therefore, its market position in the brains of buyer has empowered it to overcome an enormous extent of the market. Moreover, the degrees of profits have caused it to expand in the market. This procedure has yielded more dependability from customers and drove it to be recorded in the New York Security Exchange. Inside Strengths And Weaknesses Strengths Having analyzed the company’s improvement history, it is clear that it has endure all difficulties to get to its current position. It is additionally evident that this organization has a decent profile that can be examined to foresee its future (Mooradian et. Al., 2012). Administration Corporation International has various inward qualities that include:Advertising Looking for contextual investigation on business financial matters? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The organization has a decent work power The Company has a decent administration framework. It has had the option to support the organization through troublesome occasions. F or example in the year 2000, the monetary conditions were not positive, which influenced all organizations over the globe. Along these lines, the administration needed to reduce down expenses by shutting down a portion of its auxiliaries. During this period, they understood that in excess of 70% of the organization benefits were from United States and Canada. The organization has put resources into genuine and money related resources Service Corporation International claims various resources, which are well known. For example, it possesses the biggest burial ground on the planet that estimates 2500 sections of land. It additionally possesses Joseph Gawler’s Sons Funeral home in Washington D.C. This burial service home is favored by popular characters. These offices are eminence to offer the best administrations that addresses clients’ issues. The organization has particular brands-The Corporation has great brands, which empower clients to recognize its property, items and administrations. These brands are one of a kind and alluring contrasted with those of its opponents. Therefore, its items and administrations are well known around the world. A portion of the brands of Service Corporation International incorporates: Dignity Memorial-This brand was found in 1999, and works in 41 states in the United States and 7 areas in Canada Dignity arranging This brand is used in North America Advantage-The brand was intended to give fundamental burial service administrations. Shortcomings Even however this organization has depicted huge qualities, shortcomings can likewise be raised out of its investigation. This can be given with the assistance of the debates and outrages that have been raised against the organization. The accompanying issues have tested the intensity of the organization. In the late 1990’s, it was blamed for neglecting to watch the law. The case was managed in support of them since its author was a companion to George W. Hedge, the legislative head of Texas at that point. The state baffled the examinations of the issue. The representative and different pioneers educated the examination to be surrendered. Be that as it may, a few people stood up to. Therefore, they lost their occupations and were not given advantages as expressed in the law.Advertising We will compose a custom contextual analysis test on Service Corporation International explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More Service Corporation International has been blamed for improperly conveying its administrations. In 2010, it was blamed for having neglected to advise the family regarding a lady that they had covered their part in an off-base grave. Furthermore, they later unearthed and covered the body effectively without informing the family. The organization additionally declined the issue by neglecting to get a legitimate license from the state before playing out the activity. A fine went with this movement on the organization just as d isciplines of the staff who were associated with the procedure. To guarantee that the open notification the activity, it distributed the entire issue in the company’s site. This slip-up could have ended its business. Subsequently, it built up methods for holding fast to the law, and being cautious in releasing obligations. Outside Environment Service Corporation International is in a situation presented to hardened rivalry. For this situation, different organizations offer comparative items and administrations. Powers, for example, the quantity of contenders, operational size, piece of the overall industry, productivity, and evaluating systems impact the corporation’s seriousness (Johri, 2010). Porter’s five powers model can be utilized to show the outside condition powers. The model tends to the powers by dissecting the impact of providers, arrangement intensity of purchasers, odds of new contenders entering the business, level of competition and dangers of sub stitutes. Danger of New Entrants in the Industry A potential contestant alludes to a firm that isn't at present contending in the memorial service and burial ground industry, yet represents a risk whenever given an opportunity. This is on the grounds that the entrance of newcomers causes rivalry for clients in the business. Administration Corporation International has limited the level of new organizations entering the organization through its solid capital base. Simultaneously, working on low expenses limits new participants. The showcasing group of the company has advanced consumers’ unwaveringness. This procedure has been accomplished through compelling methods of item advancement in the business. Accordingly, Service Incorporation International is controlling a bigger piece of the overall industry. Suppliers’ Bargaining Power This identifies with business substances that gracefully contributions to the partnership. Their arrangement power represents a danger to the enterprise by meddling with costs of sources of info, for example, crude materials and other information administrations. Subsequently, providers may impact the working expenses. This danger brought about by providers will prompt engendering of costs expenses to consumers.Advertising Searching for contextual analysis on business financial aspects? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Find out More The cost directors of Service Corporation International deal with the government assistance of its providers. A portion of the methodologies embraced incorporate worthwhile costs for consistency, prizes and reward for provisions. Such business substances are viewed as a danger, and the partnership handles their issues fittingly. Danger of Substitutes The nearness of substitutes with the capacity to fulfill customers’ needs other than Service Corporation International’s items makes a risk. The company has discovered that sensible costs ought to be charged for their administrations. Likewise, the costs ought to change contingent upon the economic situations. At the point when the quantity of organizations that offer substitute administrations is little, the enterprise benefits by charging ideal costs for its administrations. Besides, Service Corporation International separates its administrations through an assortment of elements. A portion of the components utilized inco rporate geological areas, segment factors and attitudinal inclination. In such a manner, the clients have built up an uplifting mindset towards the company as the best decision. Buyers’ Powers The arrangement intensity of purchasers alludes to potential impacts that shoppers have on the costs of a company’s items or administrations. In such manner, solid buyers can influence the productivity of an organization. To get by in the business, Service Corporation International guarantees that its administrations are of top notch measures. Through arrangement of sensible valued administrations, it pulls in buyers. Simultaneously, advertise division has diminished the serious impact of shoppers in their productivity. In this way, the partnership keeps on growing consistently with no test from shoppers. Level of Rivalry delineates the idea of rivalry for clients and contributions by firms in a similar industry. Serious competition among settled organizations impacts the product ivity principles. A portion of the variables that cause such a wonder incorporate interest conditions, development rates and nearness of a huge client base. In such manner, Service Corporation International negotia

Things Fall Apart 6 Essay Research Paper free essay sample

Thingss Fall Apart 6 Essay, Research Paper Thingss Fall Apart Essay The book Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe emphatically has a fitting rubric. It clarifies how two developments with various contemplations and convictions can impact and be prejudiced towards each other. The greater part of the subject is created through the mystery plan of the account and through a grown-up male and his fight against dismay and choler ( the central character, Okonkwo ) . All through the book he attempts to choose the employments that build up surrounding him and inside himself. As the story advances, battle overpowers him and prompts his ruin and the destruction of the Ibo human progress. One bit of the book that shows how the rubric is created is when Okonkwo s character is acquainted and clarified with the peruser. The author tells how he is dark of his male parent and that he is forceful and inhumane. Demonstrating out these deformities in Okonkwo s character appears to bode his ruin. We will compose a custom exposition test on Things Fall Apart 6 Essay Research Paper or then again any comparative point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page Since Okonkwo likely speaks to the narrow minded development, that human progress s ruin is other than foreshadowed. In this way progressively clear cases happen. Okonkwo executes Ikemefuna, who resembles a kid to him. His assurance of slaughtering the male youngster is unequivocally outlandish, and he only follows up on what he was told was correct. Just like the rest of the kinfolk he follows these cust oms that appear to be indecent and unjustifiable to different human advancements. In another segment of the account, Okonkwo is ousted from his country. This occurrence is where he is rebuffed extraordinarily for his activities. It denotes a defining moment in Okonkwo s ruin, and consequently the destruction of the customary progress that he represents. His expectations and yearnings are about overlooked while he is off from Umuofia, and he direly attempts to recuperate his position when he returns. During this time of clasp, Okonkwo other than finds that his kid has changed over to his foe s ways and convictions. He deserts his kid, and doesn t need to be his male parent any more. This shows his associations with family unit and others are get bringing down to self-destruct. The most evident improvement of the subject and rubric takes topographic point at the terminal of the book, when the finishing up thump of civic establishments happens. Perhaps it is all the more a clank among Okonkwo and the new human progress, since the rest of the kinfolk appears to hold abandoned him. At the point when the Christians in the end assume control over the kinfolk, Okonkwo is dead and the conventional Ibo progress has self-destructed. This occurrence is the finishing up battle between the two civic establishments, and it s the best delineation of what can go on to a general public if its kin are inexperienced about others convictions and false to their ain.

The Economic Impacts of Cannabis Legalization in Colorado - 28600 Words

Legalizing Marijuana in the US: The Economic Impacts of Cannabis Legalization in Colorado (Research Paper Sample) Content: Legalizing Marijuana in the US: The Economic Impacts of Cannabis Legalization in ColoradoGannon UniversityTable of ContentsTOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u Introduction PAGEREF _Toc418086883 \h 3Research Question PAGEREF _Toc418086884 \h 6Review of the Related Literature PAGEREF _Toc418086885 \h 7History of Marijuana legalization PAGEREF _Toc418086886 \h 8Advantages of Marijuana PAGEREF _Toc418086887 \h 9Health benefits. PAGEREF _Toc418086888 \h 9Economic benefits PAGEREF _Toc418086889 \h 12Disadvantages of Marijuana PAGEREF _Toc418086890 \h 14Health risks PAGEREF _Toc418086891 \h 15Social Problems. PAGEREF _Toc418086892 \h 17Marijuana and crime. PAGEREF _Toc418086893 \h 18Proposed Methodology PAGEREF _Toc418086894 \h 20Proposed Findings PAGEREF _Toc418086895 \h 23Conclusion PAGEREF _Toc418086896 \h 25References PAGEREF _Toc418086897 \h 26IntroductionAny United States resident or a foreigner interested in the current affairs of the US, is probably, familiar with the heated debat e over marijuana legalization. For the over the decades, the question of whether the US should legalize the cultivation, possession, use or even sale of marijuana has taken a center stage. The US population has been divided over the subject, with the support for legalization varying cyclically. However, the support of Marijuana legalization throughout the country has been increasing steadily. According to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center (2015), a slim majority of Americans are in support of marijuana legalization. The March, 2015 survey was the first time that a national data showed a majority support for the drug throughout the history. The figure below demonstrates the trend of the Americanà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s support for Marijuana legalization as summarized by the Pew Research Centrefig. SEQ Fig. \* ARABIC 1 Americansà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ support for marijuana legalization. from Pew Research Centre. (2015). 6 facts about marijuana. /fact-tank/2015/04/14/6-facts-about-marijuana/Marijua na, also known as bhang or simply cannabis, refers to seeds, leaves, branches or flowers of the Cannabis Sativa plant, mostly in dried form. It is classified as drug owing to the chemical composition of the marijuana. Notably, the plant contains a high level of a mind-altering chemical substance known as the delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). The World health Organization (WHO) lists marijuana as one of the drugs whose abuse results in acute health effects due to its psychoactive ingredient. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), cannabis is the most common abused drug in the US today. Moreover, the Institute notes that its abuse has been increasing in the past few years following a period of decline in the 1990s and early 2000s (Van Ours, 2012). NIDA attributes the rising rates of cannabis abuse to the heated public debate on the marijuana legalization. According to NIDA, the increased public discussion is undermining the risk of bhang to human health, making it acceptable to the American society.The federal laws of the US prohibit the use of marijuana; however, the federal law does not prohibit state laws from legalizing the drug. Under the Controlled Substance Act of 1970, the US federal regulation classifies marijuana as an illegal substance which has no recognized medicinal value. The federal rules, thus, lists cannabis as a Schedule One drug substance whose use should be controlled. However, the US government does not require states to abide by the federal government's Controlled Substance Act. For this reason, different states have classified the cannabis drug under varying classes. Some of the states have found that the plan has got some medicinal value but is subject to recreational abuse. Others are consistent with the states findings and have criminalized the plant. At the time of this study, 23 of the 50 US states had some form marijuana law that is different from the federal governments. However, only four states, namely Co lorado, Oregon, Alaska, and Washington had entirely legalized the use and sale of marijuana.Colorado was the first state to legalize both recreational and medicinal use of Marijuana, after 55% of the voters said yes to the recreational use of the drug in early 2014 (Martinez, 2014). In January 2014, the people of Colorado and the US public welcomed the New Year with a mixture of celebrations and astonishment. To the opponents of marijuana legalization, the state had set flawed precedence that would mark the beginning of cannabis legalization in the US. On the other hand, marijuana traders and consumers celebrated the end of what they termed as police harassment in their trade. Thousands of traders lined up for formal licenses ready for business. Later, three other states would follow suit, increasing the use of cannabis in America. Even before the full legalization of marijuana in the four states, most American has had legal access to cannabis. The number of people in access of bhan g has been increasing steadily, since the approval of medical marijuana in some states from as early as 1996 (Van Ours, 2012). However, the entire legalization of cannabis in the four states has significantly increased the availability of bhang in America. Moreover, President Obamaà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s approval of medical use of marijuana has also contributed to the ease of access and the consequent increase in abuse of bhang in US today (Johnston Lewis, 2009).Today, almost every American can find a way of accessing the marijuana when they so wish. For those in Colorado, Washington, Oregon or Alaska, purchase of bhang is as simple as walking into the retail shop to buy cooking flour. To those in any of the twenty states where medical use marijuana is allowed, citizens can still buy cannabis freely upon a formal consultation with any of the licensed physician. Some doctors are easily influenced to prescribe marijuana upon a fake diagnosis of any of the several conditions treatable with marij uana (Van Ours, 2012). Unfortunately, legalization of marijuana, whether wholly or partially, in some US states have made it difficult for the law enforcers in the Cannabis free states to fight the drug. As Swift (2013) explains, citizens in the states that ban both the recreational and medical use of bhang are still accessing the drug from other regions. As a result, marijuana use and ease of accessibility in the US is nearly similar to how it used to be in the before its ban in the early 20th century.Research QuestionThe US federal government classifies marijuana as a schedule one drug, the highest classification of a potentially harmful drug that has o established medical value. On the other hand, different states have dissented this views based on evidence-based studies. While only a few states have recognized both the recreational and medical use, a nearly half of all the US states acknowledge the medical use of marijuana. In addition, the federal government appears to be chang ing its stance in ruling that bhang may as well be used for its medicinal value. The studies are proving that cannabis contains relevant chemical for medical purposes are overwhelmin. In addition, the pressure is mounting from the US general public urging the federal and states governments to legalize marijuana. According to the latest statistics, the public support for marijuana legalization has been on the rise (Pew Research Center, 2015). However, studies also indicate that the abuse of the drug is also increasing. While studies have proved that cannabis contains useful chemical in the medicine field, countless evidence-based studies have also shown that these chemical poses dire health risks when abused. In addition, there are various negative social impacts such as increased crimes attributed to cannabis abuse. So, should the US government legalize marijuana? Doe the plantà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬s economic benefits outweigh the health risks of its abuse and the attributed social problems?Th e proposed research evaluates whether marijuana needs to be legalized, by evaluating its economic and social benefits. The researcher will assess the impacts of marijuana in one of the first states to approve its use; the State of Colorado. The proposed research will assess the social and economic impacts that this legalization has had to the state. The researcher will also compare use and impacts of cannabis with a legally acceptable drug such as alcohol. The researcher hypothesizes that the medicinal and economic benefits of bhang outweighs its disadvantages and hence, the drug should be legalized.Review of the Related LiteratureThe issue of the legality of marijuana is a significant topic of debate among the US population. For this reason, it has captured the attention of several analysts, each making his or her contribution towards either the approval or disapproval of cannabis legalization. This section reviews some of the renowned publications that relate on marijuana legaliza tion. In this section, the researcher examines what other scholars have found about the impacts of marijuana.History of Marijuana legalizationMarijuana has not always been an illicit substance in the US history. As Van Ours narrates, the use of marijuana was legal prior to the 20th century (2012). Cannabis was freely traded in raw and processed concoctions and powdered products such as the hashish. Unlike the present use of cannabis, however, bhang was only used for its medical value. Cannabis products were used as stimulants and pain killers. Additionally, the Cannabis Sativa plant was cultivated as a source of fiber to make ropes and baskets. The recreational use of the plant was practically unknown in America, perhaps the reason the government found no need to ban its use. The Mexican immigrants introduced the idea of smoking bhang towards the beginning of the 20th century. As Swift (2013...

Changes in the College Admissions Process to Impact Students

HomeCollege AdmissionsDOJ Pushes Changes In College Admissions Recruiting: How Your Student Will Be AffectedThis page may contain affiliate links.Oct 11, 2019Brace yourself for a change in the way colleges admit students. The National Association for College Admission Counseling’s (NACAC) Code of Ethics serves as a guidepost for its nearly 8,000 college and university members. It not only steered them, but, more or less, dictated how college admissions worked throughout the United States. Yes, it kept colleges somewhat reined in with a decorum concerning recruiting and admitting students. Two years ago, in January 2018, the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division began an investigation into these ethics because they appeared to be anti-competitive and could possibly could violate antitrust laws. The DOJ seemingly thought that colleges should have a lot more freedom in recruiting students because the code of ethics possibly violated antitrust laws. In light of this investigation, the Assembly of the National Association for College Admission Counseling met in Louisville, Kentucky last weekend and voted – 211 to 3 – to strip a number of provisions effective immediately. These provisions include combing through previous year’s applicants and soliciting these students to transfer from their current school, recruiting students already committed to a college after May 1, and offering incentives (special housing or scholarships, for example) to encourage students to apply as early decision. The reason for these provisions was to respect and protect a student’s decision without any coercion from colleges. Forget all of that now. The Department of Justice believes colleges should compete for students – all the time – with few boundaries. Now, colleges will have far more leeway, at whatever price, to woo students to their campuses. While this may sound appealing, and possibly even fair, it’s not necessarily good for parents and students, or college costs. The Vanished Code of Ethics: Point by Point Let’s examine the four provisions that are now gone: â€Å"Colleges must not solicit transfer applications from a previous year’s applicant or prospect pool unless the students have themselves initiated a transfer inquiry or the college has verified prior to contacting the students that they are either enrolled at a college that allows transfer recruitment from other colleges or are not currently enrolled in a college.† College admissions staff can now cull through a previous year’s applicants and solicit students to transfer from their current school Usually, once a student commits to a college and, especially starts to attend that school, recruiting ends. With the new change, colleges can now recruit students to transfer from their current college to a new one. Translation: Don’t like your current college? Did you make a mistake choosing it? Come to ours! We’re better and we want you now.â€Å"Colleges must not offer incentives exclusive to students applying or admitted under an early decision application plan. Examples of incentives include the promise of special housing, enhanced financial aid packages, and special scholarships for early decision admits. Colleges may, however, disclose how admission rates for early decision differ from those for other admission plans.† This provision basically prevented colleges from bribing early decision applicants with lucrative packages, usually with monetary bonuses, that aren’t available to all applicants. Now, colleges can do just that because the DOJ indicated that this ethical provision hindered colleges to compete for early decision applicants. The DOJ argues that it also impedes students from getting the best deal. While that might sound good for students, it’s not. Students may take an offer to a college that doesn’t fit their needs whether academic, socially, or economically. â€Å"Colleges will not knowingly recruit or offer enrollment incentives to students who are already enrolled, registered, have declared their intent, or submitted contractual deposits to other institutions. May1 is the point at which commitments to enroll become final, and colleges must respect that. The recognized exceptions are when students are admitted from a wait list, students initiate inquiries themselves, or cooperation is sought by institutions that provide transfer programs.†May 1 has long been pounded into students’ memory banks as the day that colleges and universities traditionally consider the end of the admissions process. That’s the deadline for students to commit to a school or risk losing their place. Traditionally, after May 1, colleges even start accepting students on waiting lists if spaces are left to fill. It’s also been seen as unfair for colleges to recruit a student after this date if they are committed to a college. Now, colleges can do just that, and students can change their minds – the last thing parents need.â€Å"College choices should be informed, well-considered, and free from coercion. Students require a reasonable amount of time to identify their college choices; complete applications for admission, financial aid, and scholarships; and decide which offer of admission to accept. Once students have committed themselves to a college, other colleges must respect that choice and cease recruiting them.† This provision, too, states that colleges should not poach students from other colleges with offers and marketing campaigns. But forget about that now. Colleges can lure students to their schools, just like cell phone carriers entice customers to sign on for better service plans. What the DOJs Changes Mean for Parents and Students While the Assembly of the National Association for College Admission Counseling voted to remove a chunk of their code of ethics, it doesn’t mean that colleges have to adopt the changes. Chances are, however, that colleges will have no choice as they will have to find new ways to retain students from higher education poachers. Students may first see changes in an enrollment deposit increase. Students usually are required to pay a deposit to the college they play to attend. These deposits usually range from $50 to $500 and guarantee students a place in a college. To offset these sweeping changes in recruitment and admissions, colleges will likely raise deposits. The thought is that the more a student has invested in a college – like a couple of thousands of dollars – the less likely they will jump to another school. Already, many students pay double deposits just to hold their place until they have made a decision. High school students and their parents are already bombarded by college emails and packets wanting their business. They should now prepare for a new flood of college propaganda year-round, even when a student has already enrolled in a college. The rules of the college admissions game have drastically changed. And for now, there doesn’t seem to be a game plan on this new playing field. More marketing materials and advertising will obviously cost more money. Colleges will pass these costs on to students as they simultaneously try to woo freshmen, retain current students, and poach students from competitors. Let’s be honest: More students on a campus ultimately means more money. And ultimately, college is a business where the bottom line matters. As Eric Hoover says in this article, Welcome to the Wild West.

Was Hiroshima Necessary Or Hiroshima Essay - 1661 Words

Was Hiroshima Necessary? After the Japanese dropped the bomb on Pearl Harbor, the United States took serious offense to it. The Americans dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of them dropping the bomb on Pearl Harbor. America dropped the bomb because President Harry Truman commanded that if the Japanese made any attack on us, we would attack them. This bomb badly affected Japan. At least 140,000 Japanese people died, including 20,000 soldiers by December of 1945. At least 90% of the deceased were killed within two weeks of the bomb being dropped. 92% of 76,000 buildings were destroyed. (â€Å"Hiroshima Committee†) The decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the hardest decision for President Truman to make. He had the power right there in his hands to end the war but he would have to unleash the most powerful weapon known to man, at this time. Everyone was very tired of fighting but the Japanese would not give up so Truman decided to drop it. Even though we told Japan that if they did not surrender we would completely demolish some of their cities, they did not listen and they did not surrender. Maybe they did not think about what kind of weapons we would use because we did not ever tell them that we had an atomic bomb. (â€Å"The Decision to Drop the Bomb†) There were many causes for the United States dropping the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. One of these causes was because we wanted to increase the chances of Japan surrendering so thatShow MoreRelatedWas Hiroshima Necessary? Or Hiroshima? Essay1661 Words   |  7 PagesWas Hiroshima Necessary? After the Japanese dropped the bomb on Pearl Harbor, the United States took serious offense to it. The Americans dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of them dropping the bomb on Pearl Harbor. America dropped the bomb because President Harry Truman commanded that if the Japanese made any attack on us, we would attack them. This bomb badly affected Japan. At least 140,000 Japanese people died, including 20,000 soldiers by December of 1945. At least 90% of theRead MoreWas Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki Necessary to End World War 2?1650 Words   |  7 PagesDuring the time period when Franklin D. Roosevelt was in office, it was during WWII. Japan attacked the U.S. on Dec. 7, 1941 and was known as Pearl Harbor. When that happened, Roosevelt did not hesitate to ask Congress to officially declare war on Japan. During the war, there was a proposal of an atomic bomb landing over Hiroshima and Nagasaki to finalize the war. To this day there is still controversy that if that at omic bomb was actually necessary to end the war, because of the number of innocentRead MoreThe Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan: A Necessary Evil or an Unnecessary Act?1198 Words   |  5 Pagescities and people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan would experience something that no other people had ever experienced before, and no other people have experienced since. Within three days in the month of August 1945 and nearing the end of World War II, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan would become the testing ground and their people the test dummies for a new kind of war weapon; the atomic bomb. Was this act necessary to bring an end to World War II as has been claimed? No, it was not. For monthsRead More Hiroshima: Killing Thousands of People Essays1325 Words   |  6 PagesHiroshima: Killing Thousands of People At 8:15 in the morning, on August 6, 1945, the United States dropped the first nuclear weapon ever used in a war. Little Boy was dropped from a B-29 bomber over the Japanese city of Hiroshima1. The blast itself and the radioactive fall out killed around one hundred thousand people and demolished the city. Did the Japanese bring this upon them selves? What was the role of the Japanese civilians in the United States decision to drop the bomb? In actualityRead MoreThe Atomic Bombs in Japan1373 Words   |  6 PagesOn August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima without any precedent. The explosion viciously destroyed four square miles of the city and killed 90,000 and injured 40,000. (Weber, â€Å"Was Hiroshima Necessary?†) Three days later, a second atomic bomb stroked the city of Nagasaki which killed approximately 37,000 people and injured 43,000 (Weber, â€Å"Was Hiroshima Necessary?†). These actions of the United St ates still remain controversial today and the UnitedRead MoreJapan Bombs : Was It Necessary?1188 Words   |  5 PagesRyan Nguyen Arr. 5 Japan Bombs: Was it necessary? In August of 1945, the US dropped one of the deadliest weapons ever made onto Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it was a barbarous and inhumane thing to do to another country. Even though the US believed that by dropping the bomb, World War II would be over, it was not necessary because Japan had already tried to negotiate peacefully and its military was already collapsing during that time. The consequences of the atomic bomb were stunning. According toRead MoreA Closer Look at the Bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki1485 Words   |  6 Pages With multiple chances from the United States to surrender in the war and rejecting each one, the Japanese set themselves up for disaster. On August 6, 1945 the course of history was changed. Two atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima, and three days later, August 9, 1945, on Nagasaki that ended World War II. Japan had already been a defeated nation from conventional bombs and World War II. Many innocent lives were lost, psychological scars were left on the livesRead MoreEssay on Atomic Bombing on Japan937 Words   |  4 PagesHiroshima: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb a Military Necessity? On the morning of August 6th, 1945 at around 8:16 a.m., the United States dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima. This bomb was given the nickname â€Å"Little Boy.† Three days after the first atomic bomb was dropped, on August 9th, 1945 at around 11:02 a.m., the United States dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. This bomb was given the nickname â€Å"Fat Man.† These two bombs immensely destroyed these cities and took the lives of many peopleRead MoreWas The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Morally Justified?1736 Words   |  7 PagesWas the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ethically justified? – Why Truman decided to drop the atomic bombs on Japan – By Grace Kelsall World War 2 saw the emergence of America as a new world power on August 6th 1945, also internationally known as the traumatizing day for Hiroshima; after an American B-29 bomber dropped the world’s first atomic bomb. World War Two is considered a great turning point in modern history, it being one of the bloodiest and horrific wars; exposing all countries aroundRead More Drop The Bomb? Essay656 Words   |  3 Pagesbombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing utter destruction and many deaths. These bombs were dropped as the Pacific battles of World War II were coming to an end. Soon after Japan surrendered, ending the war. But, was the use of atomic warfare necessary? Was it too harsh and cruel to the Japanese? The first question was whether or not to drop a bomb. The effects of atomic warfare had not been known and studied, but it was apparent that it would be a good tool Was Hiroshima Necessary Or Hiroshima Essay - 1661 Words Was Hiroshima Necessary? After the Japanese dropped the bomb on Pearl Harbor, the United States took serious offense to it. The Americans dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of them dropping the bomb on Pearl Harbor. America dropped the bomb because President Harry Truman commanded that if the Japanese made any attack on us, we would attack them. This bomb badly affected Japan. At least 140,000 Japanese people died, including 20,000 soldiers by December of 1945. At least 90% of the deceased were killed within two weeks of the bomb being dropped. 92% of 76,000 buildings were destroyed. (â€Å"Hiroshima Committee†) The decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the hardest decision for President Truman to make. He had the power right there in his hands to end the war but he would have to unleash the most powerful weapon known to man, at this time. Everyone was very tired of fighting but the Japanese would not give up so Truman decided to drop it. Even though we told Japan that if they did not surrender we would completely demolish some of their cities, they did not listen and they did not surrender. Maybe they did not think about what kind of weapons we would use because we did not ever tell them that we had an atomic bomb. (â€Å"The Decision to Drop the Bomb†) There were many causes for the United States dropping the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. One of these causes was because we wanted to increase the chances of Japan surrendering so that ourShow MoreRelatedWas Hiroshima Necessary? Or Hiroshima? Essay1661 Words   |  7 PagesWas Hiroshima Necessary?   Ã‚  Ã‚   After the Japanese dropped the bomb on Pearl Harbor, the United States took serious offense to it. The Americans dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of them dropping the bomb on Pearl Harbor. America dropped the bomb because President Harry Truman commanded that if the Japanese made any attack on us, we would attack them. This bomb badly affected Japan. At least 140,000 Japanese people died, including 20,000 soldiers by December of 1945. At least 90% ofRead MoreWas Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki Necessary to End World War 2?1650 Words   |  7 PagesDuring the time period when Franklin D. Roosevelt was in office, it was during WWII. Japan attacked the U.S. on Dec. 7, 1941 and was known as Pearl Harbor. When that happened, Roosevelt did not hesitate to ask Congress to officially declare war on Japan. During the war, there was a proposal of an atomic bomb landing over Hiroshima and Nagasaki to finalize the war. To this day there is still controversy that if that atomic bomb was actually necessary to end the war, because of the number of innocentRead MoreThe Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan: A Necessary Evil or an Unnecessary Act?1198 Words   |  5 Pagescities and people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan would experience something that no other people had ever experienced before, and no other people have experienced since. Within three days in the month of August 1945 and nearing the end of World War II, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan would become the testing ground and their people the test dummies for a new kind of war weapon; the atomic bomb. Was this act necessary to bring an end to World War II as has been claimed? No, it was not. For monthsRead More Hiroshima: Killing Thousands of People Essays1325 Words   |  6 PagesHiroshima: Killing Thousands of People At 8:15 in the morning, on August 6, 1945, the United States dropped the first nuclear weapon ever used in a war. Little Boy was dropped from a B-29 bomber over the Japanese city of Hiroshima1. The blast itself and the radioactive fall out killed around one hundred thousand people and demolished the city. Did the Japanese bring this upon them selves? What was the role of the Japanese civilians in the United States decision to drop the bomb? In actualityRead MoreThe Atomic Bombs in Japan1373 Words   |  6 PagesOn August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima without any precedent. The explosion viciously destroyed four square miles of the city and killed 90,000 and injured 40,000. (Weber, â€Å"Was Hiroshima Necessary?†) Three days later, a second atomic bomb stroked the city of Nagasaki which killed approximately 37,000 people and injured 43,000 (Weber, â€Å"Was Hiroshima Necessary?†). These actions of the United St ates still remain controversial today and the UnitedRead MoreJapan Bombs : Was It Necessary?1188 Words   |  5 PagesRyan Nguyen Arr. 5 Japan Bombs: Was it necessary? In August of 1945, the US dropped one of the deadliest weapons ever made onto Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it was a barbarous and inhumane thing to do to another country. Even though the US believed that by dropping the bomb, World War II would be over, it was not necessary because Japan had already tried to negotiate peacefully and its military was already collapsing during that time. The consequences of the atomic bomb were stunning. According toRead MoreA Closer Look at the Bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki1485 Words   |  6 Pages With multiple chances from the United States to surrender in the war and rejecting each one, the Japanese set themselves up for disaster. On August 6, 1945 the course of history was changed. Two atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima, and three days later, August 9, 1945, on Nagasaki that ended World War II. Japan had already been a defeated nation from conventional bombs and World War II. Many innocent lives were lost, psychological scars were left on the livesRead MoreEssay on Atomic Bombing on Japan937 Words   |  4 PagesHiroshima: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb a Military Necessity? On the morning of August 6th, 1945 at around 8:16 a.m., the United States dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima. This bomb was given the nickname â€Å"Little Boy.† Three days after the first atomic bomb was dropped, on August 9th, 1945 at around 11:02 a.m., the United States dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. This bomb was given the nickname â€Å"Fat Man.† These two bombs immensely destroyed these cities and took the lives of many peopleRead MoreWas The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Morally Justified?1736 Words   |  7 PagesWas the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ethically justified? – Why Truman decided to drop the atomic bombs on Japan – By Grace Kelsall World War 2 saw the emergence of America as a new world power on August 6th 1945, also internationally known as the traumatizing day for Hiroshima; after an American B-29 bomber dropped the world’s first atomic bomb. World War Two is considered a great turning point in modern history, it being one of the bloodiest and horrific wars; exposing all countries aroundRead More Drop The Bomb? Essay656 Words   |  3 Pagesbombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing utter destruction and many deaths. These bombs were dropped as the Pacific battles of World War II were coming to an end. Soon after Japan surrendered, ending the war. But, was the use of atomic warfare necessary? Was it too harsh and cruel to the Japanese? The first question was whether or not to drop a bomb. The effects of atomic warfare had not been known and studied, but it was apparent that it would be a good tool